CHS200 - Critical Thinking - Module 4 Case Assignment - Fallacies Coursework

CHS200 - Critical persuasion - Module 4 Case Assignment - Fallacies - Coursework ExampleAll these features are evident in the hallucination of affirming the consequent that also incorporates a certain degree of assumption.Although Dr. Russell is forward-looking in the profession, Harolds claims that he favors the red-hot procedure do not suggest that he actually favors the procedure. Moreover, the place where Dr. Russells studied from as well as his claims should not influence the effectiveness of the new procedure. Hence, Harolds irrelevant appeal to consequences is faulty. In responding to Harold, I employed fallacists fallacy. The response uses fallacists fallacy because it concludes that the truth value in Harolds argument is false based on the premise that his argument contains a fallacy (Holt, 2006). Even though, Harold may be true in claiming that Dr. Russell favors the new procedure as effective, this is not evidence that Dr. Russell actually favors the new